January 2010

By Richard Reeve

How Schools Can Hurt and How They Can Help…

A NATSAP Conference presentation by Hannah Mariotti and Sarah Wagner from Shortridge Academy in New Hampshire focused on the findings of neuroscience concerning trauma and explored how the general framework in American education can often times create a traumatic environment.

Not only the experiences of violence, bullying and abuse were explored, but also the often times reinforced negative experiences in the classrooms across America. The emphasis on order, conformity and compliance, teacher-centric practices, the predominance of memorization and recall exercises, peer competition, a prevailing belief that ability is fixed, narrow standards of performance expectations, intolerance of differences, tracking, labeling, standardized testing, large classes and large schools, and lack of teacher support were all cited as elements in the educational system that create traumatic stress.

Do we know what trauma looks like in the classroom? A need exists to educate teachers to be on the lookout for and know when to intervene when the symptoms of trauma and the experience of the fight, flight, or freeze response loop, begin to manifest. These can include hyperarousal, dissociation and numbness. It was noted that trauma impacts the students ability to learn, reduces memory volume, and decreases problem solving skills.

A number of solutions that can be implemented by therapeutic programs to promote healing were explored. It was suggested that the impact of the any event or environment depends on the child’s hope and resilience, their capacity to transcend. Primary in the healing process is the educators presence and relationship. It’s the caring person, someone whose crazy about the kid that can move the student into a safe and new beginning. Along with nurturing relationships to extend hope, opportunities for play that foster creativity and imagination were also emphasized.

Listening, But Not Silent

by admin on January 29, 2010 · 4 comments

in Smear

(A response to a comment from Jen J.)

By Rita Argiros, Ph.D.

Thanks for expressing what I am sure many alumni are feeling and allowing me the opportunity to say that I 100% stand behind my earlier apologies for all outdated past practices and the harm that they caused. I also know that as we move forward, we will continue to change and grow and that there may be things that are common practice today that are seen as wrong in the future.  I am willing to talk personally to alumni looking for clarification, closure, an apology or want to point out other ways we could be better. I want to extend a loving hand of acceptance to any alumni who thinks we will judge them harshly because they are being true to their own values–which should be unique to them,
not a carbon copy of ours.

Jen, thanks for pointing out so clearly that many alumni, even in their resentments are looking for something from us, acknowledgment, approval, respect. To everyone who identifies with that portion of Jen’s comment: We presented you with what works for us. If you got the message that you are bad or you are a failure if you deviate from our values–I am truly sorry. I can see how we communicated that and it was wrong. You need to be living up to your own values. If any of us went overboard dogmatically impressing our values and beliefs on you that was wrong.

Today, I think we do a much better job. At FFS our values are fundamentally the same: the 12 steps and 4 absolutes. They are life saving and transformative. We want all our students to try them, to experiment with them. But if they decide to leave them behind as they move through life, that is fine. Who are we to judge?

We will do what we can to make sure future generations of Family
Foundation School students are as prepared as possible to make the transition from borrowing our values and ethics to living by their own. I think that is part of what you mean when you talk about even our critics needed our approval and acceptance.  But I don’t think we will ever be able to make that process painless. It’s part of the human condition.

As for memories and feelings about memories. It is because we do accept them as real, that we have refrained from commenting for as long as we have.  Accepting them real and agreeing that they are all 100% objectively true are two different things. Memory is fallible. We remember things that didn’t happen. We don’t remember things that did happen. We get our facts mixed up. Feelings from one event can spill over and color the memories of other events and the feelings you are having when you recall an event can permanently alter the way you feel about that event in the future. That is the reality we are in. It’s true for everyone involved.

I wish with my whole heart that people were not so polarized.  I listen to what is being said by both those who think everything we did was wrong and those who admire and respect us for doing the exact same things. I have done what I can to see things from the point of view of the alienated alumni and I will continue to do so. I wish I could have just left it there. But much that is being written about us is distorted at best, lies at worst. I would not be true to myself, my staff, my family, and the alumni and their families who benefited from FFS if I continued to be publicly silent. I regret that my post made some people who it was not aimed at feel angry and defensive. I will not go through each testimony and, line-by-line, explain what I believe and what I doubt, what I don’t understand, what I think is a partial truth, what sounds like hyperbole to me, what rings true to me, what I know from my own memory of events to be a lie–not in a public forum and not in the current litigious climate.

Regardless of the good intentions of many members of CAFETY and regardless what Jon Martin Crawford’s initial intentions were when they first wentup, recent posts, the mailing from CAFETY to 1000s of people in our community that was full of lies, the harassing phone calls, are part of an orchestrated smear campaign designed to, as you put it, “burn us to the ground.” I am not going to lay down and take it. I hope that alumni like yourself hear me when I say, I am not attacking everyone who has posted their personal story. I know that some of my favorite students and old friends have posted criticisms there and I respect that, even if I might see things differently.

Calling It What It Is

January 25, 2010

By Rita Argiros, Ph. D. I’ve decided to use blogging as a way to track my thinking and my feelings over the next several months. I already blog about dog training and I contribute to other Family Foundation School blogs and sometimes those blogs may be informed by my reaction to the smear campaign against [...]

Read the full article →

Ripples

January 23, 2010

Image by zen via Flickr Recent content from The Family Foundation School in case you missed it: 15 Minutes of Recovery at The Family Foundation School We believe in Progress not Perfection at The Family Foundation School New Family Foundation School Study Group: Wholeness in a Broken World Alumni of The Family Foundation School speaks [...]

Read the full article →

School Burnout and Troubled Teens

January 22, 2010

Image by eye of einstein via Flickr A fascinating new study examines the link between school burnout in teens and parental job burnout: “School burnout is a chronic school-related stress syndrome that is manifested in fatigue, experiences of cynicism about school and a sense of inadequacy as a student.” and “The results showed that experiences [...]

Read the full article →

Advancement in Objective Diagnosis of PTSD

January 21, 2010

All the advances in brain research over the last decade have unlocked new ways of understanding ourselves and the specific challenges we face.  A new study reveals the possibility of reliable objective testing which would take diagnostic reliability in relationship to the disorder to a new level. “With more than 90 per cent accuracy, the [...]

Read the full article →

New Study on Attitudes Toward Teen Suicide

January 20, 2010

A helpful reminder that suicide is the third leading cause of death amongst teenagers, this study revealed that the prevalent attitude that the problem existed in other communities, with both parents and teens underestimating the actual risks. This list of signs and recommended responses speaks for itself. “According to the AAP, signs that a depressed [...]

Read the full article →

The Blame Game

January 19, 2010

Image via Wikipedia By Richard Reeve It’s an interesting phenomenon that sprouts up in all sorts of disturbing ways both within and without of the therapeutic community.  Clearly the difficult problems person X is having must be the fault of somebody, right? It’s as if we still have trouble recognizing even within the professional community [...]

Read the full article →